Translate this site
EnglishSpanishFrenchGermanChineseJapanese
- Other OOIDA Websites -
LandLineMag.com | LandLineNow.com | OOIDAPAC.com | OOIDATruckInsurance.com
TruckVote.com | TRACERSystem.us | Eyeontrucking.com | OOIDAFoundation.org
Media Center | Forum (members only)
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Introduction
    • About us
    • Become a member
    • Office details
    • Work at OOIDA
    • OOIDA on tour
    • Contact us
  • Issues & Actions
    • Introduction
    • Court Actions
    • Legislative
    • Regulatory
  • Benefits & Services
    • Introduction
    • Benefits & Services
    • Rebates
    • Discounts
    • Shop OOIDA
    • Achievement Recognition
  • Education &
    Business Tools
    • Introduction
    • Trucking Tools
    • Trucking Information
    • Resources
    • Classes

join

COURT ACTIONS
OOIDA in the courtsNewsComplete list of cases
LEGISLATIVE
REGULATORY

 

Industry Links

 

OOIDA v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. mobile users

decrease font size Font Resize Increase font size
print

OOIDA files class-action complaint against Allied Van Lines for violating the Truth-in-Leasing regulations (5-5-2004)

OOIDA filed a class-action complaint with two of its owner-operator members against Allied Van Lines Inc. and one of Allied's authorized agents, TFC Inc., on May 5, 2004. The complaint alleges that Allied Van Lines, through TFC, and TFC itself violated the truth-in-leasing regulations by making a series of undisclosed, undocumented and excessive chargebacks; by failing to provide rated freight bills to owner-operators; by deducting a percentage of the owner-operators' linehaul revenue to pay for its own insurance responsibilities; and by failing to return owner-operator escrow accounts within the required 45 days after termination of a lease agreement.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed arguments by Allied Van Lines that a two-year statute of limitations should be applied to the class-action suit brought by OOIDA on behalf of owner-operators. Instead, the court agreed with the OOIDA position that a four-year statute of limitations was applicable. The court's ruling means the plaintiffs have the potential of recovering damages dating back four years instead of just two years.

Social Networks OOIDA Blog ooida on twitter ooida on facebook
Copyright © 2012 All Rights Reserved by OOIDA, Inc. |
1 NW OOIDA Drive, Grain Valley, Missouri 64029 |
816-229-5791or 800-444-5791 |
Questions and comments should be directed to: webmaster@ooida.com |
OOIDA Privacy Policy | Copyright |