Translate this site
EnglishSpanishFrenchGermanChineseJapanese
- Other OOIDA Websites -
LandLineMag.com | LandLineNow.com | OOIDAPAC.com | OOIDATruckInsurance.com
TruckVote.com | TRACERSystem.us | Eyeontrucking.com | OOIDAFoundation.org
rss RSS Feed | Media Center | Forum (members only) | Join
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Introduction
    • About us
    • Become a member
    • Office details
    • Work at OOIDA
    • OOIDA on tour
    • Contact us
  • Issues & Actions
    • Introduction
    • Court Actions
    • Legislative
    • Regulatory
  • Benefits & Services
    • Introduction
    • Benefits & Services
    • Rebates
    • Discounts
    • Shop OOIDA
    • Achievement Recognition
  • Education &
    Business Tools
    • Introduction
    • Trucking Tools
    • Trucking Information
    • Resources
    • Classes

join ooida

COURT ACTIONS
OOIDA in the courtsNewsComplete list of cases
LEGISLATIVE
REGULATORY

 

Industry Links

 

 

 

 

Press Release mobile users

decrease font size Font Resize Increase font size
print

Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association
1 NW OOIDA Drive, Grain Valley, MO  64029
Web site: www.ooida.com
Facebook - OOIDA

Contact: Norita Taylor, norita_taylor@ooida.com 
Headquarters: (816) 229-5791

For Immediate Release

Court denies Swift Transportation motion to dismiss OOIDA lawsuit: reaffirms trucker's private right of action to sue carrier

October 17, 2002, Grain Valley, MO - A U.S. District Court has denied a motion by Swift Transportation and its subsidiary companies to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA). Swift sought arguing that the plaintiff owner-operators did not have a private right of action under the federal leasing regulations and therefore, the court had no jurisdiction.

In July 2002, OOIDA and 10 of its owner-operator members filed the class action against Swift Transportation Co. Inc. (AZ), Swift Transportation Co. Inc. (NV), M.S. Carriers Inc. and M.S. Carriers Warehousing Distribution Inc., maintaining the leases of Swift and M.S. Carriers violate the federal truth-in-leasing regulations. The suit alleges the leases fail to contain a number of provisions required by 49 C.F.R.379.12. The leases also contain provisions in direct conflict with the leasing regulations. The carriers are also accused of failing to provide owner-operators with required documentation for chargebacks against compensation; forced purchase of insurance and other products and services; illegal deductions from escrow accounts; and failure to return escrow accounts within the required time after termination.

In his ruling on the Swift motion, Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt, for the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, rejected the carrier's argument and concluded the court has jurisdiction over the action. In his dismissal, Judge Rosenblatt cited previous decisions in two other OOIDA cases, (one against New Prime Inc. and one against Mayflower Transit), which confirmed truckers' private right of action to seek relief against a carrier for violations of the federal leasing regulations.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals further upheld the ruling in the Prime case.

Contact: Mike Schermoly, OOIDA (816) 229-5791

Founded in 1973, the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), is comprised of more than 85,000 owner-operators, professional drivers, and small business truckers from all 50 states and Canada. OOIDA represents the interest of this nation's more than 350,000 small business trucking professionals in the legislative and regulatory processes at both federal and state levels.

 

 

 

Social Networks OOIDA Blog ooida on twitter ooida on facebook
Copyright © 2012 All Rights Reserved by OOIDA, Inc. |
1 NW OOIDA Drive, Grain Valley, Missouri 64029 |
816-229-5791or 800-444-5791 |
Questions and comments should be directed to: webmaster@ooida.com |
OOIDA Privacy Policy | Copyright |