
Case Summary
| Case Name: | OOIDA v. Swift Transportation, Inc. |
| Court Name: | U.S. District Court for District of Arizona |
| Case Filed: | June 6, 2002 |
Allegations
Violation of the Truth-in-Leasing regulations by failing to disclose or document charge-backs for fuel and insurance, and failing to adequately provide protections for escrow accounts.
The court granted Swift’s Motion for Summary Judgment stating that motor carriers are not required to provide documentary disclosure of their mark-ups on charge-backs. OOIDA has appealed this decision and is awaiting a ruling from the Court of Appeals.
News
Court Documents