{"id":3827,"date":"2017-06-12T10:11:11","date_gmt":"2017-06-12T16:11:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ooida.com\/?p=3827"},"modified":"2019-07-26T10:41:45","modified_gmt":"2019-07-26T16:41:45","slug":"ooida-to-push-forward-with-fight-against-eld-mandate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ooida.com\/2017\/ooida-to-push-forward-with-fight-against-eld-mandate\/","title":{"rendered":"OOIDA to push forward with fight against ELD mandate"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association<\/strong><\/h5>\n

1 OOIDA Drive, Grain Valley, MO\u00a0 64029<\/strong>
\nWeb Site:<\/strong>\u00a0www.www.ooida.com<\/a><\/em>
\nFacebook:<\/strong>\u00a0OOIDA Facebook<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Contact:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>Norita Taylor,\u00a0norita_taylor@ooida.com<\/a>
\nHeadquarters<\/strong>: (816) 229-5791<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

For Immediate Release<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

OOIDA to push forward with fight against ELD mandate<\/h3>\n

An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court by a national association of small-business truckers will not be reviewed. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association contends that a mandate to electronically track commercial truck drivers was never about safety and that the government was never able to demonstrate how such a mandate would improve safety.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are extremely disappointed that the Supreme Court does not see the merit in reviewing our case with so many questions about its constitutionality,\u201d said Jim Johnston, president and CEO of OOIDA.<\/p>\n

Johnston said that the Association will continue to pursue the issue on the congressional side as part of its\u00a0\u201cKnock Out Bad Regs\u201d<\/a>\u00a0campaign and will continue to communicate with the Administration about this and other regulations.<\/p>\n

OOIDA had filed the petition seeking a review of a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit regarding the electronic logging device mandate. The court had ruled against the Association last year on its lawsuit against the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.<\/p>\n

OOIDA says mandating electronic logging devices (ELDs)\u00a0 is the equivalent of warrantless surveillance of truckers and that the government\u2019s weak excuses for doing so fail to justify violating their Fourth Amendment rights.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat intrusion on the rights of hard-working Americans cannot be justified. The mandate will not improve safety. It will, however, be another costly regulatory burden heaped upon an already over-regulated industry,\u201d said Johnston.<\/p>\n

The Association also says there are still many questions about the technical specifications and enforcement aspects of the mandate.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe mandate has everything to do with large, economically motivated entities using the government to impose their will on small businesses which comprise the majority of the trucking industry. Until the government is able to answer many fundamental and basic questions about the mandate, they should at least delay its implementation,\u201d said Johnston.<\/p>\n

Commercial truck drivers are restricted to a limited number of working and driving hours under current regulations. The FMCSA\u2019s mandate requires that truck drivers use ELDs to track their driving and non-driving activities even though such devices can only track movement and location of a vehicle. OOIDA contends that requiring electronic monitoring devices on commercial vehicles does not advance safety since they are no more reliable than paper logbooks for recording compliance with hours-of-service regulations.<\/p>\n

In its petition to the Supreme Court, OOIDA asked the court to determine whether the ELD rule violated the Fourth Amendment by failing to establish a regulatory structure at the state and federal levels that serves as a substitute for a warrant.<\/p>\n

Concerned truckers can contact their lawmakers about ELDs\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Related Press Releases:<\/strong>
\n\n\n